You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: A day late, a dollar short [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. A day late, a dollar short
While I am glad that the NYT finally got off their asses and reported this abrogation of free and fair government on the part of this misadministration, they were ready to go to press on this story a full year ago, which means they had the bubble on the issue for even longer than that.

... The White House asked The New York Times not to publish this article, arguing that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. After meeting with senior administration officials to hear their concerns, the newspaper delayed publication for a year to conduct additional reporting. Some information that administration officials argued could be useful to terrorists has been omitted.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/15/politics/15cnd-program.html?ei=5094&en=0a4739ca3ab6d63b&hp=&ex=1134709200&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print

Wonder how the 04 vote would have gone had the JudyMiller Times not kowtowed to the Monkey, and reported, to the liberal left and the "stay out of my shit" right, that your home is NOT your castle, and the GUBMINT can do anything it damn well pleases?

And what bugs me, especially, is WHERE THE FUCK was CONGRESS?

Some officials familiar with it say they consider warrantless eavesdropping inside the United States to be unlawful and possibly unconstitutional, amounting to an improper search. One government official involved in the operation said he privately complained to a Congressional official about his doubts about the legality of the program. But nothing came of his inquiry. "People just looked the other way because they didn't want to know what was going on," he said.

And when GOP assholes so CRAVENLY mix politics with national security (911! 911!!! Ooooh, be VERY AFRAID!!!!!!!) and it takes THIS to finally get people irate...well, words fucking FAIL ME.

Seeking Congressional approval was also viewed as politically risky because the proposal would be certain to face intense opposition on civil liberties grounds. The administration also feared that by publicly disclosing the existence of the operation, its usefulness in tracking terrorists would end, officials said.

Those clicks on your phone line are not your imagination!!! Fucking bastards; I am appalled.

I cannot say "better late than never" until a few heads roll...of course, that remark probably earns me a star on the enemies list....fuck it, bring it on!

I am ANGRY...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC