Reply #239: you have absolutely zero proof. None. Nada. [View All]

Whether he would have eventually called for Constitutional amendments or whether he just supported these measures totally contradicts your implications that he was out to destroy social programs.

Since there is no evidence that he would have eventually called for Constitutional amendments makes this completely irrelevent. So when are you going to provide proof? I've asked you several times now.

your implications that he was out to destroy social programs.

No, I said he cut social spending. The sources I provided prove he gutted his own programs.

FDR supported an economic Bill of Rights including multifarious social programs which would enable the minimization of welfare. You deliberately left that out of your list of FDR's implementations.

You're drawing this conclusion from your personal opinion (again). And show me where I made any list of FDR's implementations.

FDR did not get rid of Wallace for being too liberal as you claim.

Yes he did and I provided sources that show it.

The Democratic Party did not like Wallace for many reasons, many of which had nothing to do with ideology.

The main reason was that he was too far left/liberal. So, what were the other reasons?

The DP then pressured FDR not to run with Wallace. This is very different once again than how you tried to trick everyone.

My souces say FDR dumped him for being too liberal/far left. What do your sources say? Quotes and links, please.