You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #17: Hi, MH1. It is good. Just finished reading it. I thought it gave the
[View All]
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-04-06 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 17. Hi, MH1. It is good. Just finished reading it. I thought it gave the |
|
RFK piece the attention and level of respect it deserved.
What wasn't as clear is why some of the other problems Kennedy found were based on "weaker" evidence, and it created a strange kind of hierarchy of which suspicious GOP conduct was more "weak" or strong than others.
I found Kennedy's piece to be understandbly partisan, but not at all laced with any unreasonable or "weak" claims. I'd like to see the weak claims that actually WERE omitted from his article!
My guess is that they might have been valid, but that there wasn't enough zip to them to pass legal scrutiny.
Good tip! Thank you.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread