You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: No, I meant the meat behind the platitudes [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
alvarezadams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. No, I meant the meat behind the platitudes
Hey - I know that it isn't too popular around here to not support Kerry. Well, sorry - I'm a progressive, a lib - and I don't take kindly to the New Democrat/DLC types that have embraced neo-liberal economics.

I don't trust them. They follow the same basic socioeconomic ideology as the GOP, albeit with a few token (and unimportant from the corporate perspective) progressive stances.

I've had many discussions about Kerry, the DLC and the rest on public boards. It seems to me that it is quite common amongst Kerry supporters to see things that just aren't there - such as a real plan for alternative energy R&D projects. What you provided is the usual rhetoric - lots of ideals, no concrete proposals, no idea or expression of costs or mechanisms, nothing that couldn't be written off at the first opportunity.

Given the democratic (not the party but the system) propensity to rely on rhetoric and demagoguery in order to attain power - and a similar propensity to forget the promises once power is attained - Kerry's messages are indeed noteworthy. They are noteworthy in that they promise very few concrete proposals and plenty of pablum. If he were indeed serious about his stance(s) he could have done well to actually express the campaign promises with SOME detail. He never did - which failed to convince either progressives, swing voters or moderates.

If Kerry did well it was because of ABB and because the other candidates didn't have the support of the DLC-driven machine.

BTW, someone posted something about Kerry and "corporate campaign financing". Yet: http://www.opensecrets.org/presidential/indus.asp?id=N00000245&cycle=2004 and http://www.opensecrets.org/presidential/leadpac_sect.asp?id=N00000245&cycle=2004

If Dubya hadn't been such a pliabe corporate whore for oil, do you doubt that Kerry wouldn't have elicited oil corp support- or that his rhetoric would be significantly less "aggressive" (which isn't saying much)?

I voted for Kerry, but I voted ABB. I will never again vote AGAINST someone by supporting someone that doesn't share my values in the two most important aspects of governance - socioeconomic policies and foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC