You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Fear of an outburst [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fear of an outburst
of logical competence and patriotic blindness lead them to follow the lead of untrustworthy leaders because some mythical definition of those merely holding certain offices gives them some infallible trustworthiness. Members of the club with known records for mendacity and corruption and fake intel coerced from bureaucratic underlings were on one side. On the other the guns of the corporate media were lined up like North Korean artillery against the Dems. More unbelievable than opportunism and fear is the credulity of people "up there" regarding any number of transparent crimes and crises they fail to rate or detect.

The last myth is that with better provisioned and more numerous troops Iraq could have been secured away from becoming the nightmare it is. Many still believe that without realizing the Bush and neocon determinism that doom ANY plans whatsoever for a secure and independent, undivided Iraq. In several key ways, even with the military given a better hand, the whole situation would have been undercut and eventual chaos come to pass. profiteering, imperialism, deliberate setting of group against group, removal of Iraqis from control over their own affairs or "reconstruction", permanent military bases, and tons of corruption and demons in details in the public civilian sector alone.

I'll tell you what a more competent initial war would have meant. A slower fuse in Iraq and an immediate hubristic mess in Iran/Syria. And this is what where the suppositions and hopes of Dems favoring an older hawkish ME policy would have ended up in any case in Bush's hands especially, and maybe any brighter substitute. Meanwhile more foreign nations getting bribed or coerced by the oil looting would be dragged into a real WWIII scenario. Bush's failure and the Dems submitting initially to the failed experiment has made the people of Iraq take the full brunt of the war for this century's fate. Blasting our way through the 21st Century is longer a real option even if some myth of American intervention is still residing in what ifs and simple re-calculations.

In retrospect Germany could have won both world wars handily. But that is to sell the determinism of human incompetence tragically short. Given more time and chances and the same stupidity, same actors, the same results must eventually occur- worse or longer off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC