You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: Gold [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
unlawflcombatnt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Gold
IDemo,

You've brought up a very interesting topic, and one I know at least something about.

I'm somewhat of a "gold bug" myself.

The problem with owning Gold ETFs, or any other version of "paper" gold is that you don't really own any solid gold. Instead, you own a paper claim to gold. In many cases, the seller of the paper gold doesn't even have the gold that you think you've already purchased. When you actually request delivery of the gold, the holder of your paper gold must still go out and actually purchase the gold (that you thought the seller already had).

When you actually request delivery of your gold, you are charged a "conversion" fee, which is usually around 4-6% of the value of the gold. Though the seller claims this fee is to convert your "solid" gold into gold coins, it's actually to convert your "paper" gold into "actual" gold coins. In other words, the holder of your gold has to go out and actually purchase the gold (The gold you thought he already possessed.)

It may take weeks to actually receive your gold. And your seller is usually incorporated. Which means he can declare bankruptcy if necessary and never deliver the gold you purchased. This is not a "theoretical" consideration. I've already had it happen to me.

If you want to purchase gold, you need to actually take possession of it. If you purchase an ETF, you've purchased nothing but a paper claim to gold. And that claim could become worthless in an economic downturn, as the seller may not be able to make good on that claim.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC