You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #105: A particularly uninformed statement [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

DemDogs

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-30-06 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #28

105. A particularly uninformed statement

If you read here at all, you read about Edwards having the support of a number of military advisors. The Clarkies unbelievably still hold Edwards responsible for comments by Hugh Shelton, who had worked over Clark, that Clark was untrustworthy. (Like Shelton would have made that up because --ooh-- Clark was such a big threat in 2004.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.