You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Shades of Dean and Clark [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shades of Dean and Clark
They both accused Edwards and Kerry of having voted for the Bush tax cuts and got caught flat-footed doing it. Dean got slammed early about it, but I don't know if he ever responded. Clark simply bungled by doing it well after Dean had already been called out about it and compounded the deed by ignoring Edwards' direct, public request for an explanation by firing a fusillade of distortions about Edwards' voting records.

Dean's a loose cannon, but I think he's done a bang-up job as party chair, and he deserves great praise for fighting a 50 state offensive. He didn't get the credit he deserved for the success of the last election.

Clark, too, has been a great voice for rational change, and the gravitas he has from his rank and career really drives this home to many who would otherwise swallow the reactionaries' party line.

Sorry for the digression.

You're right: Richardson just keeps stumbling. He's had some dreadful appearances on pundit shows and his performances in the debates have been bad, worse and only occasionally rousing. In the New Hampshire debate he was all over the place; he was befuddled and acted almost as if he was drunk. The idea that one can scrub history in the age of the internet shows pure imbecility as well as dishonesty.

So far, his is the greatest story of the campaign: he was moving up and really threatening Edwards, he had broad support and a big chance to pull a Villaraigosa and marshall a huge hispanic vote, the media was interested in him as an underdog candidate, and he just goofs right and left. Dean made spectacular blunders, but at least it was scampering about and slamming into things, which is much better theatre than Richardson's wandering confusion.

Still, the guy's got something, and if he could get his act together, he's still got a shot. It's just that he's up against some serious star-power and showmanship and the clock is running out.

We'll probably know who our nominee is in about eight and a half months after the idiotic front-loading of Super-Duper Tuesday.

I must say, though, this is all a great show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC