You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: Don't blame the whole party for a dozen or two blue dogs [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Don't blame the whole party for a dozen or two blue dogs
Those are the ones that stopped the effort to defund the war when the timetable approach failed because of a threatened presidential veto.

I frankly think that your post should be removed because of its innacuracy and venom towards Democrats (venom that is not based in facts). First you paint all the Democrats with the same brush when it's clear that your criticism applies to the ones who stopped it.

Pelosi and Reid brought a timetable bill and surprising everyone, passed it with majority support
(but that wasn't enough because Bush was going to veto it)

Pelosi and Reid upped the ante by bringing a bill to defund the war beyond a specific date. This had the most trouble in the house where the Blue Dogs were against it. Unfortunately, without our Blue Dogs, we didn't have enough votes to pass that bill.

So Pelosi and Reid both tried mightily to bring those bills, even taking great political risk on the last one to get it through, but they were stymied because they didn't have the votes --plain and simple.

You want to complain, go line up the votes that weren't there when they voted these first times. You will have to change the minds of those Blue Dog democrats and the mind of Republicans and the mind of the President.

If you think they failed because they didn't try, you frankly are literally TOTALLY UNINFORMED.

(And your post didn't contain any actual factual basis to know that your assertion was true, by the way)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC