You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: don't twist my words [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. don't twist my words
Edited on Tue Sep-25-07 07:13 AM by onenote
i am not standing up for martin. That's bs. He has been a disaster as FCC Chairman, has been petty and vindictive and has destroyed the morale of that agency -- the day he leaves the FCC will be a day that I and a lot of other people will cheer quite loudly.

All I've tried to do here is explain what, in fact, has been going on with respect to the a la carte issue. A la carte is a terrible idea and Martin is a rogue official on it. There never was a best time for the repubs to enact a la carte because, as I demonstrated, it never had any real support from repubs or Democrats. Even when the repubs controlled both houses before the 2006 elections, McCain's a la carte amendment lost by 20-2 --- not a single repub on the Senate Commerce Committee supported him. A couple of a la carte bills were introduced while the repubs controlled both houses (one by Lipinski, for example). Not one of those bills garnered a co-sponsorship from anyone in the repub leadership.

And while some RW groups supported a la carte, other parts of the RW fundie base opposed it, including Falwell and crazy man Ralph Reed.

A la carte has become Martin's obsession. One that virtually no other policiticans share. I couldn't care less as to whether its a deeply sincerely felt obsession or just posturing. It doesn't matter since it had no chance of becoming law.

Interestingly, he has turned his attention to a different, but related cause -- he now is pushing to force cable programming networks and broadcasters that own more than one program service (for example, Fox, which owns both broadcast stations and cable networks like Fox News, Fox Sports, FX) and Time Warner (HBO, CNN, Cartoon, etc etc) from requiring cable and satellite distributors from licensing those channels in a "bundle". This so-called "a la carte" proposal would prevent a network like Disney from saying "if you want the right to carry ESPN, you have to agree to carry ESPN classic and ESPN News and ESPNgodonlyknowswhat". Does this play to the fundie? Not that I can see. But it pisses the hell out of the programming companies. Will it get enough support to be adopted? I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC