You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: As long as China and the US are both members of the WTO "normal trade relations" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. As long as China and the US are both members of the WTO "normal trade relations"
are mandatory, the way I understand it. One or the other would have to drop or be kicked out or WTO rules would have to change for us to change trading rules with them. Permanent normal trade relations with China, "rammed through Congress by Clinton", allowed it to join the WTO.

As with any multinational organization, the UN, Kyoto, NAFTA, etc, a member country can either comply with the rules it agreed to, seek to change the rules in cooperation with other members, or withdraw from the treaty or organization.

"The World Trade Organization requires members to grant one another most favoured nation status."

"In the United States, "most favored nation status" has been renamed Normal Trade Relations (NTR) in 1998 as all but a handful of countries had this status already, making it a misnomer."

"GATT members recognized in principle that the most favoured nation rule should be relaxed to accommodate the needs of developing countries, and the UN Conference on Trade and Development (est. 1964) has sought to extend preferential treatment to the exports of the developing countries."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_favored_nation

"For many years, People's Republic of China was the most important country in this group which required an annual waiver to maintain free trade status. The waiver for the PRC had been in effect since 1980. Every year between 1989 and 1999, legislation was introduced in Congress to disapprove the President's waiver. The legislation had sought to tie free trade with China to meeting certain human rights conditions that go beyond freedom of emigration. All such attempted legislation failed to pass. The requirement of an annual waiver was inconsistent with the rules of the World Trade Organization, and for the PRC to join the WTO, Congressional action was needed to grant PNTR to the PRC. This was accomplished in late-1999, allowing the PRC to join WTO in the following year."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_Trade_Relations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC