You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: The Supreme Court should have never agreed to hear the case [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-24-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The Supreme Court should have never agreed to hear the case
Remember, it came from the Bush camp. What they wanted was what they got - that the SC decided that the ballots did not need to be recounted in the state of Florida.

Breyer wrote an awesome dissenting opinion. And in that dissenting verbiage, he points out that neither camp claimed that there was anything fraudulent about the election.

We now know differently, but at the time Gore and the rest of the pmore powerful Dems like Boxer jsut were not aware of how crooked an election could be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC