Reply #79: Money money money money. [View All]

Everybody is obsessed with money today.

Who funded whom ? Oooh, scandal.

Karl Rove is cackling. He never had a problem with money like you folks have a problem with money.

Personally don't support Obama and Clinton, but it really isn't so much about the money they have received.

It is the fact that I feel that money would have an influence about their deeds and actions. I feel that way because Obama is so frustratingly VAGUE all the time, like he REALLY doesn't want to UPSET HIS LOBBYIST DONORS, and because Clinton, well, I think like husband like wife, and President Clinton sure was nice to the people with money during his era, what with NAFTA and all.

I have seen John Edwards many times recently speak words that must make the Status Quo wince. If big, evil money handed him some loot, I doubt they're seeing the return on investment they were maybe expecting.

I want to see those words of Edwards - those punishing, righteous paragraphs against the CRIMINAL SYNDICATES masquerading as oil/pharma/war/credit/insurance companies - come to pass.

This election is not about MONEY - it is about EVIL.

You can point at evil fingers handing Edwards money just as you can Clinton and Obama.

Karl Rove is cackling. If the MONEY of EVIL is all that is needed to keep a Democrat out of the White House, then we never really had a chance, and he is secure in his retirement, knowing about how he has RUINED ALL THREE LONG BEFORE THEY STARTED.

And by spinning about money, over and over again, you do Karl Rove's work.

And if nobody is good enough for you because of the money except Dennis Kucinich, then he has succeeded in making you KUCYNICAL.

And Karl Rove's money has won again. (Because it's ALL Karl Rove's money, secretly, isn't it?)