You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Instructions for Assembly of Circular Firing Squad [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:54 PM
Original message
Instructions for Assembly of Circular Firing Squad
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 05:13 PM by arendt
When I post in this forum, it is to decry "The Permanent Campaign". But, we now have the bastard son of TPC and Rovian manipulation: the racism/sexism political lobotomy.

Wake up, idiots!

It doesn't matter what race or sex starts World War 3 - we'll all be just as dead. It doesn't matter what race or sex is in charge when the corporations tell the Chinese to cut the U.S. loose to sink - we'll all be just as screwed. It doesn't matter which race or sex is "forced" to declare martial law because of a "terrorist event" - all of us DUers will be getting skybox seats at the nearest Club Haliburton.

It is real issues that matter, not some perceived snub or insult to some group. The real issues will determine our lives and our children's lives, our country's and our planet's future. And you really think that having the right sex or skin color is more important than having the right plan to stop the corporate takeover of our country?

Do you comprehend how you are all being played like a fiddle? The corporate media is calling the square dance: "Stab your partner, do-sey-do. Vote today for a corporate ho."

I hate to say that I called this, but I called this almost a year ago (Feb, 2007):

The media frenzy over Barack and Hillary is a remake of the (Clarence) Thomas nomination, right down to the "any criticism of a woman/black, no matter how legitimate and fact-based, is sexism/racism".

So, when Hillary defends her vote on the Iraq War in the face of 70% disapproval, when Hillary cozies up to Rupert Murdoch, when Hillary spends all her energy looking "tough" and invoking the Neanderthal libertarian Maggie Thatcher, when Hillary sends out her pet attack dog, James Carville, to repeatedly bash Howard Dean for doing his job well, some Democrats might be wondering what kind of a Democrat she is. But they can't wonder. That would be sexist.

And, when Barack takes the turncoat bum Joe Lieberman as his "advisor", when Barack is handed celebrity on a silver platter by a totally GOP-subservient corporate media (which normally would piss on a Democrat and, on a good day, report on one neutrally), when no-record, blank-slate Barack is jumped over a field of candidates who have views (and records!) much more representative of the majority of Democrats, some Democrats might be wondering just which corporate heavy hitters put the fix in for this guy. But they can't wonder. That would be racist.

The corporate media has some clever writers for "Clarence 2". They understand how infinitely distractible the Britney Generation is. They understand most people don't have enough historical awareness to debunk even blatant propaganda, much less the sophisticated shadow boxing of Hillary/Barack.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/arendt/80


The corporate media is gleefully pouring lighter fluid on exactly the dustup that they wanted to happen, that they planned to happen, that they worked hard to have happen. And, shockingly, DU GD-P is passing them the cans of gasoline.

Frankly, Scarlett, I don't give a damn who started it. It was inevitable, given the front-loaded primary season and the corporate-friendliness of HRC/BO, that (after a year of TPC carpet-bombing of the lesser funded) these two would be fighting for the votes of the clueless with the handicap of not offending their corporate paymasters. The only strategy left (with Edwards and Kucinich and their progressive issues safely "disappeared") to reach the mass of Democratic voters was to go negative on some superficial, but hugely emotional, issue.

And, indeed, the great mass is finally engaged. To wit - angry black women criticize Oprah for favoring Barack over Hillary. This is the GOP's wet dream. Black women - a doubly-oppressed minority - are busy ripping each others' and the Democratic Party's guts out. I fricking give up. The rank-and-file of the Democratic Party is looking too stupid to resist the invitation to "shoot somebody, anybody - especially if its not the GOP".

And, just so you don't think I'm playing favorites - YTF did Edwards put his tie into this wringer? He could have just stayed on his message. If he thinks the coverage he will get is worth it, he is mistaken. He will just get "dirtied up", something the GOP hold the patent on.

I'm going home and have a drink. Maybe if I stupefy myself enough, this will begin to make some kind of sense.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC