Reply #21: On the emperical side you are 100% wrong [View All]

The argument is based on logic and you have not disputed any of it except to say that it is not proof.

It is an acknowledged future event that I am suggesting answers the premise of why such intelligent experienced political experts are "shucking and jiving" as one surrogate said you cannot do at a press conference. You dont dispute the premise that intelligent political experts are acting like idiots so I would welcome your counter prevailing theory. The 'proof' you want we will all know the day after the primary.

The only emperical part of the arguemnt is the polls and you are 100% wrong and here is my citation:

http://www.pollster.com/08-SC-Dem-Pres-Primary.php

Five polls have been done in SC since NH all show Hillary at 30-31% No movement at all. In the last 4 polls Obama has fluctuated between 42 and 40. An earlier poll had him at 50.

I am waiting your citation that shows quote

Most of the polls have Obama ahead by only a few points, but volatility is so high that it's anybody's race unquote

It is clear that the race up until the Clinton campaign started its recent bizarre series of attacks was not a few points and also not volatile. I would say that I await your citation showing evidence but is clear that you only ask for evidence you don't use it and cannot provide. Just another empty pair of lips flapping for the Clintons.