You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: I can only say how he affected my family [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. I can only say how he affected my family
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:19 AM by calmblueocean
The late 70s were a time of enormous inflation, high gas prices, financial insecurity, and anti-arab fear (a lot like today).

Most people in my family didn't hate Carter, per se, but they thought because they were living through these times that Carter was incompetent. They wanted to feel some sort of sense of security and safety in their lives, and here was Carter on the TV wearing a sweater and telling them to turn down the thermostat. He made a convenient scapegoat.

When Reagan came into office, he did change the mood of the nation. Why do people even try to deny this? He did change the mood of the nation, in almost exactly the same way that "Professor" Harold Hill improves the mood of River City, Iowa in The Music Man. He filled people with false bravado, but when you've been down a long time, false bravado feels better than none at all. He filled people's heads with a lot of anti-government nonsense, and with a sense that, if nuclear war were on the horizon, we weren't going to be the victims. We'd be the winners.

We were lucky to have Gorby at the helm of the USSR at that time. If we'd had an old-style Soviet hardliner, Reagan's fearmongering and saber-rattling might just have pushed us into WW III. Living under Reagan and under the spectre of nuclear war was terrifying.

Having said all that, I basically agree with Obama, and don't understand why so many people seem so determined to demonize Obama for making a pretty obvious generalization. Reagan won in 49 states, people liked him, and he did transform the mood of the country. That doesn't mean he was a good president, because he wasn't. The nightmare we're in today can be traced directly back to Reagan. But I completely understand what Obama means when he talks about getting beyond the framing of the 60s, getting beyond Vietnam, and all the limiting frames of baby boomer politics. I think Obama definitely could be a figure that does what Reagan did --- but without the anti-government, partisan nonsense politics. Who wouldn't want that? I know I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC