You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #141: You may want to run a google search for [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #137
141. You may want to run a google search for
"obama - wellstone - gadfly". You will quickly discover that this is a context-less quote and more. I would challenge anybody that wants to use this as an attack to provide the full context of the statement that Obama made, I have yet to find it. You will also find that the word "mere" was added to the context-less use of the word "gadfly" by the poster of this piece to amp up something that already sounds bad when given no context.

As for body language and speculation about lie detector tests, my goodness, how low can we go.

John Edwards is a fine candidate, I would be proud to vote for him.

This piece, however, is a disgrace. It is everything that is wrong with how campaigns chatter moves forward. This piece can be summed up fairly briefly as "don't vote for Obama because I don't like the way his body moves during debates, I think that if we hooked old Obama up to a lie detector he wouldn't pass though I really don't have anything to base that on, and - oh, oh, oh - once a blogger said that Obama refer to Paul Wellstone as a gadfly and that must be really bad - though I have no idea what a single other word used in that statement was."

John Edwards would be anything but proud of this kind of attack. It is void of substance.

I certainly fall into the crowd that believes that we (yes I used the word "we" to describe the Democrats) have a good slate of candidates to choose from. I also believe that "we" would be much better served finding actual differences between the candidates and discussing those things in an intelligent fashion - as opposed to posting context-less quotes, speculation about lie detectors, and discussing body language. This sort of post is simply an embarrassment.

I get that people are working hard for this candidate or that one - that passions are running high and that they need to in order to sink the kind of time and energy many of us are putting into the support of our candidate of choice. But many here are not showing any level of maturity as they do so. After I read this piece my first thought was - wow, somebody needs a bottle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC