Reply #62: well, well, well, aren't you the nasty little one. First of all, without the [View All]

assistance of at least half of the legislature, governors got nothing. Look around the states. You will find iron butt legislators that run states, regardless of the governor.

lets compare the resumes of our front runners shall we?

state legislator: Obama, yes. Hillary, no

first lady: Obama, no. Hillary, yes.

senate of USA: Obama, yes. Hillary, yes.

Anything beyond that: nada for both. It would appear that both of them have about the same level of 'experience' as the other. I doubt that looking decorous in foreign capitals and attending funerals and representing the country well counts for more than just a hairs breath of advantage. But who the hell am I in the face of your self avowed superior wisdom?

As for governors, bill clinton was a governor and nothing more when he was elected president. He had no other experience and it was a huge issue in the election if I recall. You seem to think that matters with Obama and no one else. I don't see any former presidents running in this election and therefore that argument gives NO ONE and advantage, whether in your infinite wisdom you think it does or not. If it didn't matter with Clinton, it shouldn't matter with Obama unless you are a partisan.

You would do more with your argument, such as it is, without the vitriol. Ignorant? I think you protesteth too much, honey. You want to continue to throw rocks at me, you go right ahead. Little person. I don't care. And what you don't know about me and what I have done in my life would sink a ship.

By the way, pal, I'm for Edwards.