You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Thank YOU, DjTj. And EJ Dionne agrees with you... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank YOU, DjTj. And EJ Dionne agrees with you...
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 08:29 AM by spooky3
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31978-2004Mar4.html

"John Edwards won just one primary, yet he leaves his party with a legacy. Such an achievement usually eludes also-rans.


Edwards's strengths were said to lie in his smile, his warmth and his trial lawyer's gifts of persuasion. But these do not define his most important contribution. What Edwards leaves behind is an argument -- an analysis of what ails our country and an approach to putting things right that will survive his campaign.

Edwards talked everywhere about "two Americas," one for the privileged, one for the rest of us. Most political types said it was one of the best stump speeches they'd ever heard. It will galvanize Democrats much as Ronald Reagan's great speech on behalf of Barry Goldwater 40 years ago galvanized conservative Republicans.

The Gipper called his address on behalf of the 1964 Republican nominee "A Time for Choosing." Many liberals mistakenly dismissed it as representing the ravings of the radical right, much as Edwards's critics write off his speech as run-of-the-mill populism. But like Reagan, Edwards had a larger goal than winning applause. He sought to reframe the choices of American politics. Edwards was a pioneer in explaining what President Bush's tax policies mean: a transfer of the burden of taxation from "wealth" to "work." "

more

thanks also to other Edwards supporters--awsieDooger, jenk, arewethereyet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC