You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #65: Actually, he makes a good point that is still being ignored. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Cuban_Liberal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-24-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #57

65. Actually, he makes a good point that is still being ignored.

Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 08:11 AM by Cuban_Liberal

It was NOT Nader who cost us Florida, it was the Gore campaign itself, combined with the criminal actions of the Bush regime in Florida.

Had Donna Brazille not run the most incompetent campaign in modern memory, Nader would have been a statistical anomoly, a mere footnote in American political history. Had SOS Harris not purged the voter rolls, had qualified minority voters not been turned away at the polls, had a statewide recount been conducted, etc., Gore WOULD have won, Nader or not.

It is simply intellectualy dishonest to blame Ralph Nader for the coup d' etat of 2000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.