You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #66: well not exactly
[View All]
Hav
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-24-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #65 |
|
It is intellectually dishonest to blame Nader alone for 2000.
He played a role among many factors.
But when I see numbers here that 600000 Dems voted for Bush and add to that the partisan Supreme Court and the fact that Gore won both the popular vote and electoral college, then Nader had by far not the greatest impact.
He might have played a role in some states, that is true, but making it appear as if he alone is responsible is as wrong as saying he played no role at all.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread