You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry campaign responds to revised terror report [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 08:20 PM
Original message
Kerry campaign responds to revised terror report
Advertisements [?]
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=140-06222004


WASHINGTON, June 22 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Following release is from John Kerry for President:

"This revised report is just the latest example of an Administration playing fast and loose with the truth when it comes to the war on terror. The White House has clearly tried to blur the lines between 9/11 and Iraq, exaggerated the threat of WMD and has now been caught trying to inflate its success on terrorism. We're fighting the war on terror and we need a President who hasn't exhausted his credibility." -- Kerry Spokesman Phil Singer said.

BUSH TEAM SAID REPORT SHOWED SUCCESS IN WAR ON TERROR

Report Claims Terrorism Sharply Declined In 2003. The State Department's original report said, "There were fewer terrorist attacks in 2003 that in any year since 1969." According to the AP, "The April report said attacks had declined last year to 190, down from 198 in 2002 and 346 in 2001. The 2003 figure would have been the lowest level in 34 years and a 45 percent drop since 2001, Bush's first year as president." (AP, 6/21/04; United Press International, 4/29/04)

State Department Says Report Shows Progress In War On Terror. The day the report on global terrorism was released, Deputy Secretary Of State Richard Armitage said it showed "clear evidence that we are prevailing in the fight (against terrorism)." (State Department Release, 4/29/04)

MISTAKES IN THE REPORT ON TERRORISM WERE OBVIOUS

Congressional Research Service, Scholars and Member Of Congress Said Report Was Flawed. The Congressional Research Service "urged a review of the report's 'structure and content,'" Representative Henry Waxman sent a letter to Powell saying that that the report's misrepresentation of data was "deplorable" and two professors, Alan B. Krueger and David Laitin, wrote that the data proved the opposite of what the State Department claimed. (Washington Post, 6/10/04, 5/17/04)

Expert Says A "Third Grader" Could Have Found Report's Mistakes. Former CIA analysts and former deputy director of the State Department's counterterrorism office, Larry Johnson said "When you read the report, TTIC did not add (the data) properly. Even a third-grader could have found this. The body counts in 2002 and 2003 were at the highest levels in history." (Washington Post, 6/10/04, 5/17/04)

State Department Failed To Include Significant Number Of Terrorist Attacks. The report "does not list a single significant terrorist act occurring after Nov. 11, 2003, despite averaging 16 such acts a month in the rest of the year. The representation that no terrorist events occurred after Nov. 11 is patently false, it is unambiguous that the number of significant international terrorist acts is on the rise." (Washington Post, 5/17/04)

Powell: "The numbers that were in the report were in error, and we are analyzing where the errors crept in. It's a very big mistake, and we are not happy about this big mistake."
(ABC, "This Week," 6/13/04)
<http://www.usnewswire.com/>
-0-
/© 2004 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC