You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #39: I know, and WJC was also for the line/item veto. Everythng points to more power [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

still_one

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon May-05-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #26

39. I know, and WJC was also for the line/item veto. Everythng points to more power

to the executive branch, and less oversight by Congress

Do you really believe that it will be rolled back with a new administration and Congress?

I detest Nader with a passion regarding the 2000 election, but when the Democrats take control of Congress, and they will, this will tell me just how much difference there is between the Democrats and the republicans

If they reverse the executive power grab made by the bush administration, then there is still a chance for the Republic

Otherwise...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.