You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #124: Maybe you didn't read what I wrote closely. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #121
124. Maybe you didn't read what I wrote closely.
Your making an argument that we shouldn't ignore these non-swing states. I agree with you. Its the job of party organizations to lay the groundwork for long term gains. It isn't the job of a Presidential campaign unless they know they don't have a chance to win anyway and can waste time doing party building activities. Presidential campaigns have to be focused on that one election alone or they will lose. Likewise, get out the vote activities should be done by strong party organizations already in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC