I'm not sure what it is you're trying to say. You're annoyed that someone pointed out that Clinton's budgetary skills may be considered lacking and you point out that Obama is rich. That's not true so now you refer to his campaign?
Okay, so he has more money now and he hasn't blown it all at one shot. He's raised money in a way that makes it possible for him to collect large sums without being beholden to special interest. I'm not sure why that's supposed to be a problem. That's what we need more of. It means that when our politicians are not beholden to large corporations and special interest they are accountable to we the people.
Clinton started out with all the advantages she can have. Her fatal flaw was her complete inability to run a decent campaign. Obama's money has nothing to do with that.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
