**Ian Fleming: "The 1st time is happenstance; 2nd time is coincidence; 3rd time is enemy action" [View All]

It's clear that Hillary's comment justifying her continuation in the race because of the possibility of her opponent being assassinated was planned and used for a reason.

I believe that using it in such a way raises the risk of Obama being murdered, just like Hillar pandering to bigots has emboldened them to act and speak to national cameras of their bigotry.

Hillary's use of assassiation as a campaign strategy IS enemy action. It wasn't misspeak and the connections made between her continuing in the campaign and the possibility of an assassination were not happenstance. They weren't even coincidence, since the wording of the three statements is creepy in its similarity.

What does it take for Hillary supporters, the SDs, and the Democratic Party leadership to draw the line? Because she's a Clinton does she have free reign to use assassination as a campaign strategy?

Even Bush/Rove never used assassination OR bigot-pandering as a campaign strategy.

It's time for the Democratic Party to stand up to Hillary, before her enemy action bears fruit.