You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Lincoln? You mean that 'radical' liberal who didn't respect property rights?!? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lincoln? You mean that 'radical' liberal who didn't respect property rights?!?
It's the ultimate irony that the Republican party was founded as a regional proNorth, and especially Pro-New England party, considering how the GOP couldn't be deader in the New England states today, and has embraced the south today as everything they stand for. When the GOP was founded they were everything the south wasn't, and everything the south loathed.

It's even more ironic that a lot of the south's arguments and issues they were for back then have been adopted by the republican party today (though some have been slightly modified to be up with the times), I mean look at the similarities of the GOP's agenda to the south's agenda before the civil war.

-Both are strongly pro-property rights (then the South wanted their right to own slaves protected, now the south wants their rights to own guns protected)
-Both are strongly anti-tax (a lot of the taxes back then were tariffs that protected northern manufacturers from foreign competition but were loathed by the south)
-Both are strongly anti-government spending (more government spending on stuff like building roads met more taxes to pay for it)
-Both are the pro-discrimination parties

Lincoln ironically was a moderate liberal in his time, and after the civil war ended the radical republicans (who were radical liberals for their time) basically ran the show from congress for a while as Andrew Johnson powerlessly watched almost all his vetoes get overridden by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC