You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Board (State Board of Education) gets a taste of evolution debate [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Kansas Donate to DU
coda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 09:25 AM
Original message
Board (State Board of Education) gets a taste of evolution debate
Advertisements [?]


Posted on Thu, Apr. 14, 2005


Board gets a taste of evolution debate

The State Board of Education questions intelligent design proponents in a preview of next month's hearings.

BY JOSH FUNK

The Wichita Eagle

<snip>

The minority group has lined up 24 witnesses, while no one has yet agreed to represent the pro-evolution majority view -- partly because some mainstream scientists have called for a boycott. "Opposition to the hearings mystifies and troubles me," said John Calvert (a retired lawyer who runs the Intelligent Design Network), who helped summarize the minority group's proposals along with former middle school science teacher Greg Lassey.


<snip>


Moderate board member Carol Rupe of Wichita reused some of Calvert's words to make her own point during the questioning, saying "It's opposition to science that mystifies and troubles me."


<snip>

Case and Williamson responded to questions about details of the majority's draft and explained why most members of the committee opposed the minority group's proposals. The way science is described in the standards -- as a search for natural explanations to natural phenomena -- is one sticking point.


The minority group says using the word "natural" in the definition makes the standards biased in favor of evolution because alternative theories might cite a supernatural cause for changes in life on Earth. "The current definition inserts a bias and that prevents critical analysis of evolution," said Lassey, the former science teacher. "In other words, it's a science stopper."


But the majority of the standards committee says describing science that way simply reflects its limitations because scientists can test the natural world only.




more........

http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/11389545.htm


R E L A T E D L I N K S
• Draft of proposed state science standards
• What's covered in Wichita biology courses
• The Intelligent Design Network
• Kansas Citizens For Science
• The Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture
• The National Center for Science Education




Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Places » Kansas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC