You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: As I read everything so far the Supreme Court never said the [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Oregon Donate to DU
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. As I read everything so far the Supreme Court never said the
law was unconstitutional, they just said that Federal laws trump it. Depending on your point of view one could say that it has been overturned since the wholepoint of the law was to make it legal for certain people to smoke pot and others to grow it for them. Basically since you can still be arrested on Federal law that makes the state law more or less pointless since it doesn't provide any protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Places » Oregon Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC