Reply #20: Downside of recount in long run [View All]

There are good reasons not to make too much noise about the Ohio recount (although of course we need it to be completed).

Many of the election problems will not be seen in a recount. Factors (in Ohio and elsewhere) such as long lines and scare tactics such as "warning" minorities of risks of imprisonment if they vote) are not seen in a recount as such votes were never counted. While it does not apply in Ohio, the biggest issue may be having a paper record of computer votes.

If we make too much noise about Ohio, and then the recount shows that Bush still won, which most likely will occur based upon the votes actually cast, the public might then think that this whole issue is nonsense.

We need to quietly have the recount and gather data. Should there unexpectedly be evidence that Kerry has the votes, then action should be taken on this. Otherwise we need to concentrate on the bigger issues. We need to push for requirements fora paper trail. We need to push for national standards for voting. We need to ensure that minority areas do not have long lines. We need vigorous investigation and prosecution of false registration and voter intimidation schemes.

We cannot afford to have these issues be ignored by Republicans claiming this is all nonsense should Bush win the recount. We need to have Republicans on the defensive on this issue, and have the public question why anyone of either parthy would oppose law to ensure fair elections.