Reply #15: 2000 was close [View All]

That's why all the elections people wanted there to be a larger margin in 2004... and they got it! Coincidence or conspiracy?

There was some uproar in 2000, but it wasn't about how computers did the dirty deed, it was the shenanigans of certain election officials that got heat. Hardly anyone even looked at the computers then.

But the fact remains that it was greatly effected by computers. Anyone who has studied it comes to that conclusion. But did you hear the DNC or the pubs decrying that fact? NO.

Even up to Nov. 3, it was like pulling teeth to get anyone in high office to even look at evidence of computers destroying the vote. The gist of what Imajika was saying is wrong. Only now are some higher ups looking hard and long at what the computers can do. Give them a few more weeks and they will be bitching.