You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: I don't think this is that big of a deal. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
jhgatiss Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. I don't think this is that big of a deal.
Similar to the Ellen Connolly numbers, I don't think this is indicative of fraud. In many rural areas, I don't think its unusual for someone who has made personal connection with many people there, perhaps living there their entire life, to outperform the Presidential candidate. People don't vote straight party line all the time.

As for the Ohio Supreme Court matter, it's dubious at best. Judges can't put their party affiliation on the ballot, so many times people don't know so they just guess. Its sad but true. Its probably how Ellen Connolly won more votes than Kerry in southern Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC