Reply #71: I would never question your judgment [View All]

And you seem to ignore the fact that I do not doubt your truthfulness or experience. I do not doubt your reputation. I doubt your motivation. your personal grudge is interfering with my desire for survival.

Your observation was practically in the first line of the thread about the IP address. No news there. I knew that before I even mentioned it. That is not, however, the end of the story. The work, and it seems to be good work too, continues over at BBV.

Your personal experience wit her seems to blind you to the fact that she is doing work no one else is. You demand everyone on DU to choose Bev's side or the side of those against her. I think most of us don't want to choose sides at all. Hurt feelings are inconsequential compared to the magnitude of the task we face.

This whole conversation is creating the false notion that DU and the resistance underground has some sort of ownership or rights over BBV. Well, we don't. If you gave money, like I did, it was a donation, not an investment. She has full authority to spend that money as she sees fit. She seems to have spent it going to Florida and placing lawsuits and launching freedom of information acts. I got MY money's worth right there.

I don't know Bev and I don't know you, but she appeared on the radio empowering Randi with something akin to evidence of fraud when no one else did. It doesn't matter if you or someone else did the work to uncover it, she is the one who got it higher into the public discourse. She seemed at the time to be lucid enough and presented her information in a way that got noticed and made converts.

Is she borderline psychotic? Maybe, I don't know. But if she is, she has been that way all along. It is not something that she could help, or something that she just suddenly did to spite anyone. If you didn't spot that when you first started working with her, I'm sorry, but that's your bad. I should know, I've made that same mistake and had to spend over fifteen thousand dollars in legal fees to extract myself.

The people with greater rational capacity have the greater responsibility. All of this activity is most likely making her more unstable, and threatening the outcome of multiple legal actions. Is she the best person to be in charge of these legal actions? Possibly not, but she is the only one to step up and place them.

The level of paranoia necessary to accept national presidential voter fraud is alright, but the level necessary to believe those who did it would protect themselves is not? There are more than just freeper-creepers here.