You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: I'll try to catch you up [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll try to catch you up
but I have a hard time keeping up myself

1. The ohio SC judge through out Arnebeck's case because it contested two different elections: presidential and the presiding judges reelection. I'm not sure if there has been a consensus on this, but it appears the judge should have recused himself from the case because he was one of the defendents. There was another thread the discussed wether there was even a rule that made Arnebeck's original filing incorrect. Regardless, the judge dismissed the case without prejiduce, so it was only a matter of splitting it into two cases and refiling it. Arnebeck refiled it yesterday.

2. Most Ohio recounts have been matching the machine recounts. A University of Iowa proffesor signed an affidavit saying that these recounts were worthlesss if the machines had been tampered with since the election. A women has signed an affidavit saying that a TRIAD employee was working on a polling machine in her precinct. You can read the affidavit here: http://www.truthout.org/mm_01/5.121004.Robersondep.pdf
Apparently TRIAD employees have been making visits to a lot of ohio counties.

There have been a few counties where the 3% recount and the machine counts weren't matching, but the BOE blamed it on the machine and said that they needed to get new machines in order to make the recounts match up. This is pretty unorthidox, becuase if they aren't matching now, then they weren't matching on election day. They are required to do the recounts by hand now, but I'm not sure that's going to happen.

Recount volunteers from Cuyhuga county have come forward and said they don't think the recount was necesarily on the up and up. There seems to have been long strings of votes for one candidate and then the other. This suggests they may have been looked through and possibly manipulated before the recount.

There has also been some speculation that the precincts weren't picked randomly...
3. Cobb said Kerry was trying to undermine the recounts. There is no consensus on why he did this. It is possible that it was to get Kerry to step out of the shadows...who knows.

4. Katrina (don't rememeber her last name, but she is the one who found the recount place with the doors open and lights on) was run off the road by two blue sububans, and more recently her tires were slit.

5. Here's an article about New Mexico that you should read.

http://www.helpamericarecount.org/NewMexicoData/NewMexicoGeneralElection.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC