Reply #76: Voter "Disenfranchisemen"t is what our Dem Leadership doesn't want to [View All]

deal with....and that's what "Selection 2000" will ...in the end...come down to. It's too late (maybe) to prove BBV/Opti-Scan Fraud (although for 4 years folks here and elsewhere have been "ONTO IT.")

In the end...I understand why Conyers/Jesse, etc. have been in Ohio...all we can hope to get out of this is "DEMOCRATIC" Voter Disenfranchisement.

Which is why Arnebeck's lawsuit was delayed. We don't have a "Legal Leg" to stand on in this "He said/She Said/He said" fight, except that all over America ..REAL VOTERS were DISENFRANCHISED" with either "Provisional Ballots cast in wrong place, Long Lines which caused folks with real jobs to be turned away, or ballots lost, misplaced or thrown out.

Anyway one cuts it...Voter Disenfranchisement is the "LAWSUIT." And, in the end whichever machine you are "disenfranchised on" doesn't matter...it's that it happened at all. The "Machines" still prove to be "UnTouchable" in that the companies refuse to release their "CODE" and that very few average Americans understand what's wrong with Computerized voting...since for the most part their "e-mails" get through...inspite of the "Urban Legend Virus Alerts" that turn the "Newbies off."

:shrug: