You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: There is absolutely no chance, without hard proof [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
gulogulo Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. There is absolutely no chance, without hard proof
of fraud, which would be either physical evidence or confession of someone who participated in the fraud, of Bush not becoming President. If you think there was fraud, though, and you can prove it decisively (and decisive means: look, I recounted, and there were hundreds of thousands of votes miscounted), even after the inauguration, Bush will become the lamest of all lame ducks. But you don't seem to want that to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC