You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Recount ends in Licking County, Ohio ; criticism continues [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recount ends in Licking County, Ohio ; criticism continues
Recount ends; criticism continues
Bush, Kerry each gain 2 votes in county

By KENT MALLETT
Advocate Reporter

-snips-
The Licking County Board of Elections voted Wednesday afternoon to certify the Nov. 2 presidential election, ending the recount sought by Libertarian Party candidate Michael Badnarik and Green Party candidate David Cobb.

Green Party observer David Lore, of McKean Township, said he did not know if the Green Party would take the recount issue to court by filing a contest of election. Lore said he expected little change in the totals, but was disappointed observers were not allowed to look at the voting machines, provisional ballots, polling books or signature books.

"We wanted to check a sample of the signature book with the number who voted at a particular location," Lore said. "For example, if there were 600 signatures and 700 votes."

A Tuesday press release from Lore and Mary Lewin, recount coordinators for the Green and Libertarian parties, said it was the discretion of the local board, not an opinion from the secretary of state, that determined what observers could see.

The secretary of state's office, however, did not always provide a clear and consistent road map to local elections boards, King said. For example, the state office told the board to seal voting machines for 60 days after the election, but would not put the directive in writing, he said.

"If they'd just get together and have some uniformity," King said. "Can they look at the machines or not? Can they see (voters') names or not?"

The Lore-Lewin press release stated, "Each candidate's position on the ballot is rotated from precinct to precinct, so witnesses wanted to check whether the machine programming matched the ballot assembly booklet seen by the voter."

The press release goes on the say a mismatch between the ballot and the programming could result in a voter punching a hole for one candidate, but the computer recording it as a vote for another candidate.

A directive from Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell "strongly encouraged us to be done by Thursday," Long said.

"What it amounted to in sports terms was running out the clock on us," Lore said. "We started out with two (recount) teams and (Domestic Relations judge recount) started with four teams. I was not happy with the cooperation."

Link:
http://www.newarkadvocate.com/news/stories/20041223/localnews/1780974.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC