You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: Except that in your historical example, the two houses [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
delphine Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Except that in your historical example, the two houses
were unable to agree.

In this case we're talking about a repuke congress and repuke senate deciding whether to accept electors for their repuke overlord.

Not likely to be any sort of disagreement or any reason to appoint committees. They'll just vote to accept the electors.

We could trot out Jesus himself to vouch that he saw Karl Rove manipulating the voting machines and they'd still accept the electors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC