Reply #103: The question is proof as to who is responsible. [View All]

Again, Putin is not happy with the US/CIA's involvement.

My bias is not amazing, I am actually illustrating the hypocracy of the bush admin's position. No "proof" (eg admissions or confessions) yet ready to support one candidate's claim of fraud over anothers. If I am not mistaken, the fraud was worse the 2nd time around and the candidate that Russia supported alleged that our admin's candidate was responsible.

It is you that is bias. Your bias drips from every reply you post. The proof of the election fraud at home is mountainous (affidavits, video, tampering, lost ballots, locked down precincts, closed precincts, destroyed ballots, admissions of the owners of the companies involved, admissions of the elected officials, etc.) yet you chose to ignore it.

And you have yet to accomplish the research (as simple as it may be) in providing the links to the international observers statements regarding our deplorable voting process or even acknowledging that you are aware of the statements.

Bias, not much!