You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: There certainly are some weird numbers in Warren.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
harmonyguy Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. There certainly are some weird numbers in Warren....
and you point out some additional weirdnesses.

I too, grabbed the presidential race pages from the SoS site, at numerous time on election nite and subsequent days, as well as the Warren County canvass results, of which there were only two sets published Nov 3 at 143pm and Nov 15 at 1252pm.

In spite of the SoS site indicating 1465 provisional ballots, they later published another page showing 1952 provisionals issued and 1625 accepted in Warren County.

I believe that some of the other differences in totals lie with the number of folks who supposedly went to the polls, waited patiently in line, and although they cast a ballot, they didn't select ANY presidential candidate. I'm showing 1070 of those on the initial results and 1093 by the final results.

In looking at the Warren County precinct by precinct results, there are many instances where the increase in votes for the candidates exceeds the increase in total ballots cast. Let's see, if each of three candidates is given one additional vote, you'd expect there to be at least three additional ballots counted, wouldn't you? After all, it wouldn't be right to have votes for two different candidates on the same ballot? I think I counted at least 15 precincts that must have had THAT problem.

What's a certified vote? I don't know, but in some cases it appears that a certified total is when a board of elections say "Enough of this counting nonsence - let's just decide that we've done our jobs properly and go home. We'll all just sign-off on these numbers and call it a night - after all, if WE can't get them to add up no one else can either"

Don't know if this helps or not, but thanks for the opportunity to vent.

HG ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC