You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: no [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. no
Edited on Sat Jan-29-05 04:53 PM by Faye
it shouldn't even mention the word vote. to people who are not aware of the issues, hearing the word 'vote' can imply the voter is at fault. which is true in SOME cases, but NOT as a general whole.

that is the point, we cannot use the word 'vote' when talking of the entire spectrum of fraud. 'vote rigging' can still imply the VOTER rigged their vote, or rigged something.

The election was fraudulent, NOT the voters.

on the other hand, there is no other way to say 'voter intimidation'. that is an issue that is PART of Election Fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC