You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #44: That's very interesting
[View All]
Time for change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
| 44. That's very interesting |
|
My more general point was that it appears that in Ohio the good majority of electronic fraud was performed centrally. I say that because there have been at least two studies (ESI and Walter Mebane's study which is documented in the DNC report) which have cast doubt on the possibility that widespread fraud was committed by switching votes at the prcinct level. Their studies are based on statistical analysis of Ohio voting patterns, and they may very well be right on this point (I'm not willing to absolutely concede that point, but my guess is that they're correct.)
Would you agree with that?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread