You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: Are states going to take over the task of testing voting systems? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. Are states going to take over the task of testing voting systems?
Election Update

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Are states going to take over the task of testing voting systems?

The two-day "Voting Systems Testing Summit", sponsored by the California Secretary of State, was a wonderful opportunity to hear a lot of ideas and perspectives on how voting systems are tested today, and how we might improve testing to insure that future voting systems have increased accuracy, security, accessibility, usability, and other important attributes. Once I pull my notes together, I'll have some more commentary about some of presentations and interesting ideas discussed at the summit.

But many of the participants in the summit kept asking the same question --- exactly what was the motivation for the California Secretary of State to host this event? Again, it was great to hear from election officials, vendors and academics about how we can improve testing processes --- but why now, and why in Sacramento?

One interesting hypothesis circulated in discussions with many participants, based on two themes that clearly resonated throughout many of the summit presentations and discussions. The first theme was that the current testing and certification process is not working well, as vendors, election officials, and the academics seemed to agree that the existing process is broken. The second theme suggested a possible solution --- a stronger role for states in the testing and certification process? There were many different suggestions made along these lines, ranging from states (California?) developing strong and independent testing regulations and procedures. Others suggested that perhaps there might be some ways for states --- perhaps in a consortium --- to collaborate on stronger testing and certification procedures. And
others argued for a consolidation of state and federal testing, to save money, time and prevent duplication of effort.

So this leaves open the question --- will California take the lead on an initiative to develop a strong and independent testing authority within the state? Will California work with a consortium of other states to develop some strong and independent joint testing authority? If California doesn't do it, then who will?

snip/more

http://electionupdates.caltech.edu/2005/11/are-states-going-to-take-over-task-of.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC