You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: MO: Petitions backer sues secretary of state [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. MO: Petitions backer sues secretary of state
Kansas City Star

Posted on Sat, Jun. 03, 2006

By KIT WAGAR
The Star’s Jefferson City correspondent
The sponsor of two ballot measures rejected by the Missouri secretary of state’s office sued Friday, arguing that disorganized petitions should not override 400,000 signatures in support.

One initiative sought to prohibit the government from taking property for private development projects through a process known as eminent domain. The second sought to set new, more stringent limits on state government spending.

The lawsuits, which were filed by a group called Missourians in Charge, say clerical errors in the petitions do not justify a decision to keep the two measures off the ballot. State law, the lawsuits say, requires the secretary of state to overlook clerical and other technical errors when in the process of validating the signatures.

“On May 7, we turned in 400,000 signatures. On May 25, the secretary of state says she is not going to count them because page numbers were out of order,” said Patrick Tuohey of Kansas City, treasurer of Missourians in Charge. “We believe that the secretary of state is wrong on the law and wrong on the Constitution. Ultimately, the will of the people to have their voices heard trumps any bureaucratic technicality.”

Secretary of State Robin Carnahan rejected the two measures because the stacks of signature pages were submitted in little discernible order with signatures from different counties mixed on unnumbered pages. Her spokeswoman, Stacie Temple, said state law requires lists of signatures on initiative petitions to be submitted by county and on sequentially numbered pages.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/14730284.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC