Reply #106: As far as where threads belong, bloom, shouldn't yours be in the feminist or philosophy forum? [View All]

It appears the only reason you posted them in here is so that you could creatively re-interpret the ideas presented in the book and use them to take cheap shots at atheists.

You remind me of Falwell, Dobson, Coulter, O'Reilly and the other hate spewing preachers/pundits who use everyday examples having NOTHING at all to do with atheism and spin them in order to vilify us.

Why is it that no matter what book you claim to be reading, you always manage to twist the author's words around so that you can draw a negative parallel to atheists?:

Atheists are like religious fundamentalists, atheists are like misogynists, atheists want to ban religion, atheists worship science, atheists think Sam Harris is a god, atheists are mean to you, blah blah blah...

I bet you can't read The Ladies Home Journal without finding something in it to use against atheists.


Who made you the arbitrator of who is and isn't interested in religion and philosophy and who should and shouldn't post in this forum?

Should we start calling you Mrs. Decider?

Perhaps if you posted coherent ideas having to do with either subject, instead of using threads like this to bash atheists, you would actually receive serious responses.

If you want to discuss your anti-atheist philosophy and new age religion du jour without being challenged, bloom, try using one of the groups, because as you well know, someone's going to call you on it when you do it in here.