You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: no it's an axiom [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
parkening Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. no it's an axiom
something that for this arguments sake is taken to be true. It's up to you to poke holes in this assumption. Which you're trying to do and that's great. That's what debating is all about.

A couple of quick comments. If you give up the principle of causality, you must give up science.

The universe must have begun to exist as one cannot construct an infinite regression of events into the past. It is a necessary conclusion that the universe must have begun to exist. It's also what every scientist will tell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC