You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #43: Changing meanings of words to imply false equivalence [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
43. Changing meanings of words to imply false equivalence
I can see certain contexts where it might be appropriate to classify atheism as religion. If I'm in a book store, looking for a copy of "The God Delusion", and I see sections for Home Repair, Science Fiction, Personal Finance, Romance, and Religion... yes, I'll go looking in the Religion section. If I worked at that store, and was stuck with those broad categories, Religion is where I'd file the book myself. The book is most certainly a commentary on religion, even if it does not promote a specific alternate religion.

I'd say the general context where I can accept the idea of atheism as a religion is one of broad taxonomic classification. Bald isn't a hair color, but if you're forced to fill in hair color on a form, filling in "bald" makes more sense than filling in red or brown or blond or whatever hair color you might have had at one time, and is more informative than leaving the space blank.

When an atheist is accused of having a religion, however, (and this is often done in a blatantly accusatorial fashion), it's generally done to try to paint the atheist as a hypocrite. The person making the accusation doesn't need to feel themselves that having religion is a bad thing when making this accusation. A black man might do some digging into the ancestry of a Klansman, turn up a black ancestor, and then confront the Klansman with this information. That certainly doesn't mean the black man thinks being black is a bad thing, does it?

The point of a black man showing a Klansman that the Klansman has black ancestry is, "If you hate black people, you hate a part of yourself! Is that what you really want to be doing?"

Similarly the point of the theist in classifying atheism as a religion is generally done (at least in my experience) as way of trying to say, "How can you be against religion since you've got one yourself?", "You've got a religion, and it's just as much faith as mine!", etc., etc.

In that context, trying to call atheism a religion is just a game of playing up false equivalence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC