You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: I disagree with the focus of your answer. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I disagree with the focus of your answer.
You seem to be focused mainly on solipsism. I don't believe that was a major concern of the Vienna Circle or of Logical Positivism. They held that statements must be deduced from a priori truths, or deduced from empirical observations in combination with other established truths. Quine, who sometimes sat on on the discussions of the Vienna Circle, pretty much demolished their assumptions in his paper, Two Dogmas of Empiricism.

Those dogmas can pretty much serve as their metaphysics, and Quine convincingly showed that they did not survive careful scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC