You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #79: Pop Fallacy ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #43
79. Pop Fallacy ...
Pol Pot may or may not have been 'atheist' ... Being born and bred in the heart of Khmer, he certainly was raised with the knowledge of the Buddhist traditions associated with the earlier Khmer civilization ... Ankor Wat, one of the most famous ancient eastern cities, was known as the 'City of the Temple' ... One of the WORST criminals during the 'Kampuchea' years was a man known as 'Ta Mok', a former Buddhist Monk who led vicious pogroms against KR associates as well as civilians ...

I would note that Stalin and Mao cannot be defined as 'Atheist', even if their parties declaimed religion ... The chinese possessed theology which respected a plethora of deities and household gods ... There is no evidence that Mao specifically rejected the ancient beliefs ... Stalin was also raised in the lap of Russian Orthodoxy ... His credentials as an 'atheist' are also suspect ...

Furthermore: ALL of these 'atheists' directed their furies towards fellow party members ... obviously forced atheism was NOT the cause of these vicious actions ....

There is no evidence that Atheism has EVER been the cause of massacres against believers .... ever ... There no 'atheist theology' that demands adherence to an atheist creed ... How does one force another man to NOT believe in something ? ...

One more point: My problem is that FAITH purports a divine moral impulse .. a live connection with the primal moral force within the universe ... Atheism declares no such 'divine' source ... HUMANITY is our collective .... Atheism ACCEPTS its NON-DIVINE human nature .... It is FAITH that insists itself superior to 'humanity' by it's association with the font of moral purpose: its deity ...

I ACCEPT that 'man' is an animal ...

I do NOT accept that 'faith' in a deity forms a 'human divinity' that is superior to NON believers ....

I would expect that religious folks would NOT act as animals ... yet they do ... why ?....

WE say: because you are HUMAN ... Its your 'divinity' that is suspect ... not your humanity ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC