You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #34: No, IMO, RFK does *not* say Kerry was right to concede.
[View All]
IndyOp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-03-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
| 34. No, IMO, RFK does *not* say Kerry was right to concede. |
|
He simply repeats Kerry's explanation for why he conceded - he didn't have the evidence he needed.
He should've stuck around to find the evidence!!!
Congressman Conyers held hearings with Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs-Jones in Ohio in the beginning of December and Senator Kerry should've been there -- having not yet conceded!!
How ridiculous: Kerry should've conceded because the Conyer's report had not been published yet. Holy fucking sheep shit. Conyers and his staff worked themselves to exhaustion to hold those hearings and produce that report all during November and December. Election fraud activists worked themselves into exhaustion helping to organize the hearings in Ohio and busted their asses to get the corporate goddamn media to cover the issue.
AND ALL KERRY NEEDED TO DO TO ENSURE NATIONAL COVERAGE was to not concede.
Instead, Blackwell gets away with lying that the election was nice and tidy.
:mad:
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread